How can I prove my compliance if ASIC asks for evidence?
You prove compliance by producing clear, current and reliable records that show what happened, who was responsible, what decision was made, why it was made, and how any issue was monitored, escalated or remediated. Policies help, but ASIC will usually look for evidence that your compliance framework works in practice.
The detail
This issue commonly arises when a licensee is asked to respond to an ASIC notice, surveillance review, breach enquiry, complaint, adviser file review or remediation issue.
The practical challenge is that many businesses believe they are compliant because they have policies, registers and templates. That is not enough. You need to show that those documents were used, reviewed, followed and improved.
For example, a breach policy is useful. But the stronger evidence is the incident record, assessment notes, escalation trail, responsible manager review, client impact assessment, remediation action, board report and closure approval.
The operational risk is simple. If you cannot produce evidence, you may struggle to show that you met your obligations, even if your team acted appropriately. Missing records create reliance on memory, emails, spreadsheets and after-the-fact explanations. That increases regulatory, dispute and governance risk.
Good compliance practice means building evidence into normal work. Each key compliance process should create a record as it happens. That includes advice reviews, complaints, incidents, conflicts, training, supervision, outsourcing, risk reviews, compliance monitoring and breach assessments.
A better way to manage this
A better approach is to treat compliance evidence as an operating system, not an archive.
You should be able to trace an obligation through to the control, the activity, the person responsible, the evidence produced, the review outcome and any corrective action.
Where configured, [complyᵉ] can support this by centralising compliance tasks, registers, attestations, monitoring activities, findings, actions and reporting. This helps you move away from disconnected spreadsheets and inbox searches.
The outcome is stronger visibility, clearer accountability, consistent evidence, better oversight and less manual reconstruction when ASIC, AFCA, an auditor or your board asks what happened.
Practical guidance
- Map your key obligations to the records that prove each obligation is being met.
- Capture evidence at the time work is performed, not after an issue arises.
- Assign owners for compliance tasks, incidents, reviews and remediation actions.
- Review registers and reports regularly so issues are identified, escalated and closed properly.
- Test whether a third party could understand your decision-making without asking staff to explain it from memory.
Common mistakes
- Relying on policies alone. A policy says what should happen. Evidence shows what actually happened.
- Keeping records in too many places. Fragmented evidence makes reviews slower and increases the risk of missing key information.
- Creating records after the event. Retrospective notes are usually weaker than contemporaneous records.
- Failing to close the loop. An issue is not properly managed until actions, accountability, remediation and closure are recorded.
Discover how [complyᵉ] helps turn compliance activities into measurable evidence.
Talk to us