How do I know whether our compliance framework is improving over time?
You know your compliance framework is improving when evidence shows fewer repeat issues, faster closure of actions, better quality records, stronger oversight and more effective controls. Improvement should be measured through trends, not isolated results. A good framework becomes easier to monitor, easier to evidence and more useful for decision-making.
The detail
Compliance improvement is often assumed rather than measured.
A business may update policies, complete more reviews or hold more compliance meetings, but those activities do not automatically mean the framework is getting better. Improvement means your compliance system is becoming more effective at identifying risk, preventing issues, escalating concerns and supporting accountable decisions.
The best way to assess improvement is to compare performance over time. Look at whether the same problems keep appearing. For example, are adviser file review findings reducing, or are the same disclosure issues recurring each quarter? Are incidents being reported earlier, or only after clients complain? Are corrective actions closing faster, or staying open for months?
You should also consider the quality of evidence. A maturing compliance framework produces clearer records. You can see who made decisions, what information they relied on, what action followed and whether the outcome was reviewed. This makes ASIC reviews, audits and board reporting easier because evidence is created during normal work, not reconstructed later.
Good compliance improvement should be visible in several areas:
- obligations are mapped and regularly reviewed
- monitoring focuses on higher-risk areas
- findings lead to corrective action
- actions are verified before closure
- recurring issues are analysed
- Responsible Managers and directors receive meaningful reports
- staff understand what they need to do.
If your framework is improving, compliance should feel less reactive. Your team should spend less time chasing information and more time analysing trends, improving controls and supporting better decisions.
A better way to manage this
A better approach is to define improvement measures and track them consistently.
Where configured, [complyᵉ] can help capture compliance activities, incidents, findings, actions, attestations, evidence and reporting in one place. This makes it easier to compare results over time and identify whether controls are improving or the same issues are recurring.
For example, you can monitor overdue actions, repeated findings, completion rates, incident trends, review outcomes and evidence gaps. This gives Responsible Managers and the board a clearer view of whether the compliance framework is becoming stronger, not just busier.
The goal is to make improvement measurable. When compliance data is centralised, you can move from anecdotal updates to evidence-based oversight.
Practical guidance
- Define the indicators that show whether your framework is improving, such as repeat findings, overdue actions, evidence quality and issue closure time.
- Compare results across reporting periods so trends are visible.
- Test whether corrective actions have fixed the underlying issue.
- Report both improvements and weaknesses to management and the board.
- Review the framework regularly so obligations, controls and monitoring remain current.
Common mistakes
- Counting activity as improvement. More tasks, reviews or meetings do not always mean better compliance.
- Ignoring repeat issues. Recurring findings often show that the root cause has not been fixed.
- Closing actions without verification. A completed action should be supported by evidence and, where appropriate, follow-up testing.
- Reporting only current status. Boards and Responsible Managers need trend information to understand whether the framework is strengthening or weakening.
Discover how [complyᵉ] helps turn compliance activity into measurable improvement.
Talk to us